Molecular Visualizations of DNA Video

Amazing CGI visualization of molecular biology's central dogma. It shows animations of DNA coiling, replication, transcription and translation.
It was created by Drew Berry of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

Simply because ...
Simply because science helps to explain what was previously, "Unexplainable" by the human mind, when the subject of "God" was brought to? the table. What you should have realized is that Einstein was right. He said "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Enjoy the ride.

She sounds like ...
She sounds like Daria. No joke.?

where is there ...
where is there anything to do with? religion?

"not studied"? You ...
"not studied"? You want to go back to? the Middle Ages? You know, you can enjoy things AND study them at the same time.

Wish? i could ...
Wish? i could activate all of my dna!

cool dna video. ...
cool dna video. Those 3d? bugs spiders thing at 0:49 & 3:13 freak me out

molecules are ...
molecules are highly sensitive and most attempts to view them end? up destroying them in the process. perhaps in the future of nanotechnology a nano sized engineered organic "camera" could be injected into a cell and emit harmless reflective particles (like photons) and store the result although that's highly theoretical.

Agreed.?
Agreed.?

What the actual ...
What the actual f**k? This is science, why is there? anything to do with religion on here?:P

"it would take God ...
"it would take God to do? this MIRACLE EVERYDAY" Why?

"I dont care what? ...
"I dont care what? Darwin says or those who claim this molecule produced itself by random? chance whatever produced this molecule is God in my book" So... you don't care if what you believe is true? You're just happy believing "god-dun-it" and screw any evidence to the contrary? Talk about intellectual dishonesty...

"Spontaneous ...
"Spontaneous generation,? was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur " And replaced by abiogenesis which is DIFFERENT. Seriously,? you could have easily looked this up.

"panspermia" ...
"panspermia" Panspermia says that the building blocks of life (or indeed life itself: bacteria-like organisms) were seeded on earth through meteorites. But the those building blocks (or bacteria) still require an explanation of how they formed. And then we're back to abiogenesis.? Abiogenesis is all about how non-living matter can become living matter through chemistry. Wheter that happened on this planet or in a space rock is actually not that relevant.

Yes, but all should ...
Yes, but all should remember that? all this is provided by scientific thought and methodology and not religious though and dogmas.

Ok.?
Ok.?

well.....? there is ...
well.....? there is no god.............. stop talking about religion in scientific videos. im not being anti-religious, i just find it annoying. this isnt a church, its youtube

And? ppl say there ...
And? ppl say there is no God....-_-

There aren't just ...
There aren't just two "theories" concerned with the origin of life; haven't you ever heard of panspermia? Francis Crick is quite the proponent of such a notion. And evolution isn't "true"; it is continuously proven right with respect to natural selection (but that doesn't translate to truth). It is science, the pursuit of truth is ongoing and more than likely impossible to? attain.

its all? fake. we ...
its all? fake. we came from rocks smashing into rabbit turds and this randomly happened, all chance. it could happen all the time.

DNA society? seems ...
DNA society? seems suspiciously socialist..

So incredibly? high ...
So incredibly? high right now.

I stumbled over the ...
I stumbled over the best documentary on this topic. Look for "Programming? of Life"

"There are only two ...
"There are only two possibilities as to how life? arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution;? the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility" Thats one of the most idiotic unimaginative things i've ever heard and its sad because this is how our society gears people up to think. In dualistic absolutes. I wish people would take mushrooms and realize just because evolution is true doesn't mean life is meaningless or random. we dont know s**t

Jeezum, guys. Why ...
Jeezum, guys. Why don't we all just shut up about all these "creation" theories. Nobody is right and nobody is wrong. The reason we're all here? is a wonder of life, and it should be enjoyed, not studied. Keep an open mind.

No A lot of ...
No A lot of technical advancement comes in 60 years. Why should I not expect? to see proper evidence?

@Turtleo0 you're ...
@Turtleo0 you're kidding right??

ehm komme? aus ...
ehm komme? aus münchen

"There are only two ...
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation,? that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others.

That leaves us with ...
That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God.? Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution." (Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology," Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100)

This displays ...
This displays technology far beyond anything man made , as those who search the stars for evidence of other life they stumble n grope as if blind for nothing speaks louder than the humble microscopic molecular engineering shown here. I dont care what Darwin says or? those who claim this molecule produced itself by random chance whatever produced this molecule is God in my book

---